欢迎安装高清版[一起看]电影APP
评论太可怕,喜欢剧情跌宕起伏险象环生的电影,请携家带口去看贺岁档大电影。这部片子从画面、节奏、演技、配乐哪一点都足以原谅剧情的不足吧。这么低分实在可悲。女主炸裂的演技,让我迫不及待的想看她黑化进行报复,但后半段女主选择放下,说明女主心中还是一直抱有对生的希望,从女主之前养花,布置家可以看出女主是一个内心充满希望的人。
也许只有能感同身受的人才能静心看完电影吧。能看到很多和自己相像的地方,原生家庭没有正常的爱,结婚后老公疏于关心,公婆漠不关心,他们在乎的只是肚子里的孙子,反复的刺激,终于导致了我的抑郁,女主是异食癖。女主只有通过吞咽这些尖锐的物体,感受到痛从而感受到活着的感觉,因为在别人眼中,她一点都不重要,但是她在她自己感受中,是真实存在的能感受到痛的,她并不是没有感情的动物。就像开场白那几只弱小的无助的白绵羊那样任人宰割。“高攀是要吞针的”。女主在周围人每次刺激她时,都会病情变得严重。刚开始从叙利亚来的保姆理解不了女主,觉得她只是矫情,到后来红着眼眶帮助女主逃走,可是女主的老公和公婆在女主不要去精神病院并在她出发的时候要求她交出结婚戒指和手表,也就是女主老公和公婆对于女主的关心和关切,连一个保姆都不如。她周围任何一个人如果与她的沟通能够带有爱,带有安慰善意和关心,她都会好转,可是一个都没有。在变得越来越严重的边缘,连她的妈妈都说地方不够,她不方便过来同住一段时间,她崩溃了。幸而最后她找到亲生父亲,亲口告诉她,她与他不同,她什么都没错,他没有因为她而感到羞耻,她终于被这次谈话救赎了,是的,她其实不难满足,然而身边的人都满足不了她如此小的需求。她终于看清一切,与她妈妈选择生下她不同,她选择堕胎,她想重新开始生活。最后她在厕所一个人忍受了自己选择所带来的疼痛之后,扎着清爽干净利落的头发,背着书包,对着镜子微笑,走去人群,开始她自己做主的生活。
剧情简介的“黑暗秘密”简直就是BULL SHIT!完全误导人
片中的女主在我看来挺让人讨厌的 害人害己 可怜又可恨
男主一家对她的不尊重让她去做一些不可理喻的事来体现自我价值 前半段每当她表达自己想法说些什么的时候 老公及全家要么没好好听要么直接打断 真的很不尊重人 让人很有挫败感 这点我深有同感 而且不止一次 不被尊重的感觉真的很糟糕我只能说 所以她才做些偏激的事吧 想引起别人的注意 想成为焦点 想被人看重 想找到自己的价值感存在感 不想被人当做空气不被在意 我真的太有同感了 只是我不会做伤害自己偏激的事。
另外 我挺喜欢这种细节感放大的拍摄手法的 类似《福斯特医生》 我很喜欢这部英剧 比这部电影好看 只是电影够简短 一个多小时就能诉说一段话 一个故事 一个含义。
电影三星 因很有同感故多加一星
刷微博看到了这部异食癖患者的精神世界《吞咽》
小手飞快地找到了资源
咋说呢 中规中矩 基本没有快进 就想看看她都吃了点啥 小朋友们不要看 生理上会引起极大不适 不要学习
剧情啊 虽说是在男权一味控制下女主不得不找点方式舒压 可干点啥不好 非要吞咽点奇奇怪怪的东西 最后又拐到了原生家庭童年阴影 感觉有点脱节 后半段有点垮掉了 但女主的颜和画面色彩还是🉑️以的!!!
Two 2019 feature debuts from aspiring filmmakers that hold fast our zeitgeist by putting a female character in the dead center. Kitty Green’s THE ASSISTANT is exclusively lensed from our titular heroine’s perspective to cast a startling light on a salient social issue in the wake of the notorious Weinstein effect; meanwhile, Carlo Mirabella-Davis’ SWALLOW, doggedly builds up a reductive dissection of a young, gravid bride’s eerie disintegration, by dint of uncomfortable body horror tropes to reify her pica affliction.
Adhering to her technique developed as a documentarian, Green adopts an uncharacteristic angle to tackle her unsavory subject matter. In THE ASSISTANT, Garner plays Jane, a junior assistant in an unspecified NYC film production company, and the film takes place during her overlong working hours on a hectic Monday. We watch her being picked up by a limousine to work long before daybreak, and follow her in clerical drudgery, see the big shots from her peripheral vision and hear things only within her earshot. By doing that, Green risks narrative clarity and leaves the scandalous skinny in connotation or off-screen, consequently the film rather invites an immediate revisit to suss the implications of every casual dialogue and throwaway joke, and for better to piece together what is going on.
Green’s strategy, not audience-friendly, but totally chimes in with Jane’s grunt-level existence in the company, but felicitously, do we really need to see those sordid goings-on with our own eyes? We shall all be thankful to Green for being so considerate in her approach, because such a canker, condoned systemically by the industry and beyond is better limned as this immaterial, omnipresent force of vileness, penetrating every couch and behind every closed doors in every office and hotel room, it is everywhere therefore it must be put paid to.
Carrying the entire film on her slender shoulders, Garner exhibits strenuous stamina and restrained body language as the doormat (Jane is a sponge absorbent of the negative outpourings of the boss’ wife) and the dogsbody (she is virtually invisible in front of her superiors and other colleagues), even the two male assistants callously exploit her newness (only being there for 5 weeks), or maybe also because she is a she, and let her bear the brunt of blame and verbal abuse. Yet, in her position, she has no right to say otherwise.
Jane aspires to be a producer, and she knows all too well that she must pay her dues and turn a blind eye on the seedy matters, if she wants to make it. But on the off chance when that actually happens, she will have already become one of the silent connivers in that toxic working environment (implied by the unseen boss’s sinister motivation). Moreover, she should considered herself lucky, according to the head of Human Resources (Macfadyen), simply because “you are not his type”, it’s all so reassuring! Macfadyen has that peculiar air of faux-earnestness, mixed with veiled hubris, to express the warped normalcy as if it is the most commonplace words to utter, whereas Garner is so utterly disconcerted and anguished in her botched worm-will-turn rebel, their exchange is the crescendo of this gritty film.
Incredibly, THE ASSISTANT plays up the working place’s drabness, impersonality and functional symmetry to keep us absorbed with its coded message. However, SWALLOW is so stunning on the eye level, the young couple, Hunter and Richie Conrad (Bennett and Stowell) are gorgeous, their affluent, minimalistic upstate NYC residence with a killer view, is often filtered through prismatic hues to emphasize the magic power of money.
But what happens inside is far less majestic, Hunter, hailed from a lower class, is maladaptive to her new ascendancy as the cinderella, who has a bun in the oven and develops an anomalous appetite for inedible things (including some small sharp objects, those swallow scenes are fastidiously arranged, and not for the squeamish). Does she subconsciously want to lose the baby? and why is that? A thought never occurs to our prince charm Richie, instead, his family hires a burly minder Luay (Nakli), a Syrian immigrant, to keep an eye on her minute by minute to forestall any self-inflict harm, solely for the safety of their precious progeny.
If the plot is piled up with unmitigated clichés (cruel, senseless rich people, good-hearted immigrants, a fable of perfect family of origin, the psychological manipulation of negging and nonpology, the list goes on and on…) and Mirabella-Davis might be a lousy fabulist, what gives vitality to SWALLOW, besides Katelin Arizmendi’s stylish cinematography, is Bennett’s metamorphic performance. A frail flower distressed by her parentage (the cat will be let out of the bag later) and conjugal negligence, Bennett, who looks like a poor girl’s Jennifer Lawrence, grandly inhabits Hunter’s compulsion, disorientation and exasperation with such astonishing finesses, one cannot take eyes off her. Even when we cannot relate to Hunter’s weird condition, we are compulsively intrigued by Bennett’s nuanced delivery and delicate mannerism, hoping some deus ex machina can materialize to save her.
Eventually, Mirabella-Davis grants Hunter a touching closure (Denis O’Hare’s brilliant cameo is exactly what the doctor ordered, he can proficiently pull off a complicated emotional range in meager minutes, though on paper, the reconciliation is still a mawkish cliché) and the final shot statically looking at a lady’s room with people come and go writ large the film's emboldened stance: pro-life and pro-woman.
When all is said and done, both THE ASSISTANT and SWALLOW are promising works well wrought by their emergent creators, together, they paint a vivid picture of the wrongs (in the working place or in one’s own home) inflicted upon women by faulty, haughty, selfish men, but they are not just reproachful to the stronger sex, their artistry underlies more hope in women’s resilience, Jane might walk the plank the next day, she can at least have peace with herself and knows better of her goals, as for Hunter, starts anew and puts aside a failed marriage, together with her psychogenic malady, scrumptious comestibles are beckoning and cinderella can get stuffed!
referential entries: Darren Aronofsky’s MOTHER! (2017, 6.6/10); Cory Finley’s THOROUGHBRED (2017, 6.5/10); Leigh Whannell’s THE INVISIBLE MAN (2020, 6.9/10).
Title: The Assistant
Year: 2019
Country: USA
Language: English, Mandarin
Genre: Drama
Director/Screenwriter: Kitty Green
Music: Tamar-kali
Cinematography: Michael Latham
Editing: Kitty Green, Blair McClendon
Cast:
Julia Garner
Matthew Macfadyen
Noah Robbins
Jon Orsini
Kristine Froseth
Dagmara Dominczyk
Alexander Chaplin
Purva Bedi
Juliana Canfield
Makenzie Leigh
Patrick Wilson
Rating: 7.4/10
Title: Swallow
Year: 2019
Country: USA, France
Language: English, Arabic
Genre: Drama, Mystery
Director/Screenwriter: Carlo Mirabella-Davis
Music: Nathan Halpern
Cinematography: Katelin Arizmendi
Editing: Joe Murphy
Cast:
Haley Bennett
Austin Stowell
Elizabeth Marvel
David Rasche
Denis O’Hare
Luna Lauren Velez
Laith Nakli
Babak Tafti
Zabryna Guevara
Rating: 6.9/10
不幸的身世使得Hunt一直在寻找我是谁,认定我是被社会抛弃的孩子。遇到了“完美”先生所获得的一切,劝解自己“我应该很幸福”,但这样的生活越发使得她脱离安全感,如何使得丈夫爱她,如何不犯错,强大的自卑和缺乏安全感折磨着她。直到发现了“吞咽异物”所带来的安全感,当冰冷尖锐的金属触碰舌头时带来的强大结合感,让她瞬时感受到“被拥抱”“真实存在感”以及隐含的“无所不能”,以及“控制欲”。那一瞬的快感让她保持一天很好的自我存在感和安全感。最后在与生父的探讨“找寻自我”中真正地释放了自己。有人批评了最后女厕所的镜头,我却觉得非常好,最后她还是回到了属于她的世界,一个平凡的阶层,一个并没有那么体面的场合,她只是芸芸众生中不起眼的女孩。
在中文视频网站评论区看见了最恶心的评论:1.这女的真自私 2.男主一家真不幸摊上这么个有病的女人 3.这女的什么也没付出,就是在卖惨
很棒的Pregnancy Horror作品。在《魔鬼怪嬰》中,女性的身體在不情願的狀態下被植入和灌進不同的企圖和物質,而在《吞嚥》中,女身卻主動索求,自理吞噬,把自己的身體昇華成通道,把懷孕的裸相扯到觀眾面前。很喜歡結尾,公廁人來人往,每個人都在這裡斥退了某種賤物,洗把臉,抖擻精神,又有路要上。
玩概念的片子,部分画面有不适感。道理都懂,原生困扰、高阶级的冷漠自私和伪善云云。短片体量,拍成一个半小时太长了
7分,你是一个可以取悦男人的宠物,一个一无是处的废物,一个乱七八糟都能吞咽的怪物,一个可以生孩子的子宫,你是一个女人。
关于怀孕和生活的恐惧,对身体耻辱的轻视以及周旋于完美人设临近边缘的崩溃,其实话题很老生常谈,却依然提供了一个很出彩的寓言觉醒故事。印象最深刻,也是最瘆人的,是阳光明亮的豪宅和干净得耀眼的布景所属于的明鲜和片子一开始就笼罩着不安的惊悚气氛(还有层出不穷的呕吐)形成的刺眼对比。Rogerebert上的影评形容女主的故事犹如“Betty Draper”,这简直太贴切了。Haley也是演得相当好,颠覆了对她的认识。
6.5/10 贝内特演技大爆发啊,刮目相看 主题已经不新鲜,但老酒新装,利用异食癖来引导出那种缓缓的绝望,还是蛮聪明的。
一部会引起生理不适的电影,主题略老套,还是在描述女性被物化被忽略,沦为一件物品(对这个家庭来说就是个失败的投资)。最让人心碎的是女主的therapist竟然把秘密告诉自己老公,即使老公威胁如果不告诉就不让女主继续咨询,这也不该是咨询师违背职业道德的理由啊,尤其是咨询师应该看得出来她完全受老公掌控。后半段寻强奸犯生父的片段略出戏,另外女主身无分文是怎么start over的好困惑,还好三个月以内还是可以药流的……12.4@海南电影节第六部
某种意义上的《生吃》——有关“食”的怪异迷恋,有关女性的自我探索与自主权的争夺,以及有关法国新极端主义式的、精致而疼痛的Body Horror。
7.5如果一个女人的嘴里会说出女主得这病只是闲的慌,就别怪男人“见仁见智”。有钱就是想要的生活,你大可以去试试看,嫉妒让你蒙蔽了心智。别觉得自己生活比女主糟糕比女主穷就鄙视别人得富贵病,最后连男保姆都有了恻隐之心,但你和男主一家都没有,所以你们皆为垃圾。
HIIFF第二部,是我喜欢的类型,但是在节奏上可能我不怎么适应,让我想到了 生吃,这个如果是导演的处女作,那我非常看好这个导演,镜头语言非常不错,在立意上,原生家庭还是家庭关系问题的表达还可以更加夸张魔幻一些!
Women in The House:安然无恙 1995 / 远离天堂 2002 / 消失的爱人 2014 / 吞咽 2019 / 隐形人 2020
通过自残式的吞咽来夺取对身体的自我权 是女性被忽视被控制被器官化被物化被污名化被疾病化的反抗
高概念,但故事底子差
保姆小哥说得对,女主就是太安逸闲得慌。要是生在战争国家,子弹天天在头上飞来飞去,食不果腹,还会想吃土吃金属?虽说男主一家生性凉薄,但这不是有钱人通病吗,前期对她也不错啊。明明可以自己去学钢琴、外语、跳舞,丰富精神世界,天天躺床上百无聊赖这还能怨谁?就算是有童年创伤,但比她惨烈还比她坚强的也有很多吧...真的觉得有点矫情。男主一家也是,财大势大婚前不了解女方过往背景?能接受儿媳是普通售货员?太假了。
关于“食”的怪癖,通过吞食异物来获得潜藏的控制感,生吞针头玻璃球长钉,来宣誓和对抗生活的不满,关于女性的自我探索以及自主权的争夺,展现了社会阶级的压抑,入嫁富豪家庭也有本质上的困苦,一切关乎于女主原生家庭的困扰,和高层阶级里人们的冷漠和虚伪,在孤独寂寞的牢笼里,终觉错付了真情,所有才有了想逃离的叛逆劲儿,女主是母亲被强奸后的产物,精神上有强大的自负心理,摆脱不了源头的无力感,所以婚姻的不幸和腹中的胎儿,她想夺回决定权,一种极端主义下的疼痛切割,一如人生关系或肉身分离。一部有想法的窥探和剖析女性内心的片子,只不过角度和行为都偏向猎奇,并且会强烈的造成观者的生理不适,揪出的道理看过的都懂,但噱头抢占了先机,群体描写符号化,令这部女性概念先行的解读反思,被压缩了空间失掉了偏颇,处处流露着浅薄之气。
#2nd HIIFF#裹着猎奇外衣的女性主义电影。除了吞咽东西的过程拍的惊心动魄之外,非女主之外的角色塑造的一塌糊涂(甚至曾经一度认为寻父的情节就是结局)。在脑洞上不及《生吃》,在主旨上又是如此俗套——贫家女嫁入豪门饱受欺凌,最终唤醒内心放飞自我。净想着怎么吸引眼球,倒不如好好看看瓦尔达的片子反思一下女性主义电影该怎么拍。
看女主见啥吞啥越吃越有瘾的癖好真让在下羡慕不已。发现富人们吃土那是心理疾病穷人们吃土那是真穷。女主这富太太不好好当非要吞咽点奇怪的东西最后还不过了,如此病娇自虐的病真应放到非洲部落好好治疗一下。全片形式大于内容有点矫揉造作了
竟然学生气这么厚,无期待仍然失望。半吊子心理分析童年阴影老生常谈,文字游戏式的人物状态分解,美术精致但毫无必要。最好的一段是躲进床底的设计和表演。前半段压抑感制造得不错,主要得益于台词和女主表演,后半段全部垮掉。最后那段也是为了过审吗?为完结而完结,没别的招儿了吗?突然的硬凹太受不了了。
HIIFF 抱着“生吃”的期待,被前面评论里的“部分画面极度香艳”给骗了…限制级画面并不多啊,节奏略慢,但大特写和小细节不错。缺点是情节递进不够,后半部分反而不如前面抓人眼球。(女主几个镜头确实像大表姐)
一坨屎,我为什么要看一个半小时的神经病。如果把精神病院的人放出到社会中,那每个人都能成一部片了