惊天告密

让我想掐死你。

一帮中学毕业只经过狗屎训练的人应承包公司所聘来到了一个满目疮痍的国家做联合国高级人。

于是，为了体现自己的高级，就践踏别人。为了自己感觉良好，为了满足自己的变态，为了钱。

呵呵呵呵呵呵

女主角在raid那个oasis酒吧的时候，正准备带走那些女孩子的时候，突然来了一帮人，一个人五人六的小伙子，面带得意的贱笑站在那里。

那是个什么心理？是不是真的觉得自己好高级啊！！

在解雇女主的时候，右边那个黑人警卫脸上的贱笑，也挺到位。

虽然这都是演的，但是这是根据真实事件改编的电影，所以我相信当时那些人的贱笑也是很到位的。

因为人嘛，不管你是黑红黄白，都是一个德行。






由于被数位高端深刻的社会精英抱怨看我写的这些话是浪费时间，所以我不得不不加一句：我写的都是废话，请“高端”“深刻”的人不要看，谢谢！！！书包背背好，不要再掉了。

这片子是今年第一次看片后有去查资料去翻历史的冲动的片子，根据真实故事改编往往都是些有着撼动能力的片子。今天一直在找有没有类似的片子，没有，真没有，后来想想这也是应该的，一，历史是不容复制的；二，政治丑闻不是那么随随便便可以浮出于众。更可见它的难得。
为何会这样？
打着人道主义的口号，做着人性泯灭的事；作为维持秩序正义的人，做着游走于法律之下的事情。一直认为任何一件事的发生归根究底都会有一个根本原因的诱使，同样像他们也一样，原因就是这些人都有一个保护伞------外交豁免权。没有法律的制裁以及监督，残暴一览无遗，当同伙壮大，这种现象根本是无法想象的。就像战后的波黑。
或许会觉得前半段有些冗长，但是看后回想起来，几乎每一句台词，在片后的对比都是一只强力拳，足以打碎那些虚伪的正义。
关于制度
波黑是一个多名族国家，存在强烈的宗教间矛盾，92年三个民族围绕波黑前途和领土划分等问题开战。战后联合国派遣维和部队来重建，但是这却为他们带来了新一轮的灾难。看电影里为了可以保护那两个女孩凯瑟琳算是恳求那个部门的女同事，但是她只会冰冷地重复制度、规矩。可是他们呢？凌驾于制度之上，游走于法律之下，还不如强盗。
关于人口贩卖
07年李扬拍《盲山》，在国际上大受欢迎，可在Z国却被打入禁片的冷宫，一不露肉，二不暴力，但却被禁，因为揭露了一个残酷的现状----人口贩卖。看片时我也在假想如果我也是个被贩卖去的人怎么办？看不到明天，活着和死了差不多，估计八成选择咬舌自尽，赶紧投胎。“每一天都会有女孩被贩卖”，
关于媒体
媒体的本质，永远是一个向霸权献媚、为强盗歌颂、毫无道德可言毫无廉耻之心的妓女本质。 这是大众的普遍认知。不过片中的这个真相有幸可以公之于众，很庆幸它越过了美国，是靠BBC以另一种方式报道了出来，BBC和此事没有直接的利益冲突。作为媒体的良知从始至终都是个模棱两可的问题，如果太敢说真话，最终嘴是会被封住的。即使看过这部片，这个看法我还是不会改变。
关于最后
最后想说，Z国永远不会拍这种片子，甚至播出

像这样一部黑色现实题材的片子
我不给5星都难啊

故事不做累述。
若想质疑其真实度，可以稍稍wiki，再买书看。
虽然我也没看过，但以史为鉴，可以辨别。

我要说的不是这个现实问题怎么解决，
也不是对我们有什么启示，
毕竟说了也没多少人会在意，
更何况还说不清楚。

我依然喜欢提的还是关于人的问题。
你说为什么有些人可以丧心病狂，有些人可以十恶不赦，
有些人可以视而不见听而不闻？
嘿，但终究还是有些人可以fight for Justice。尤其还是one women's fight for Justice

嘿嘿 要我说，这还是生命力的问题。
这也是我标题的意思。
如果说，我们腐朽的体制和环境会慢慢腐蚀人的心灵，那么生命力越是旺盛的家伙，越是难以被蚕食和消灭。

所谓死人脸，影片中给的很到位。
就是满脸颓废，或者面瘫样，或者呆滞，或者害怕和恐惧。
死人的世界不消说就是——地狱。

不过这是在人间，所以还不全是死人。
还有几个骷髅头。
稍微注意一下：影片里给我们这正派的镜头角度都是有棱有角的“骷髅头”形象。

一脸死气是因为灵魂中缺少了点东西，
或者说内心早已被蒙蔽，一种将死未死的状态。
而骷髅头，就是死过的人，而且死的非常彻底，以至于历经多年都没有消失的白骨。

到底有着多么重的怨念啊~
2次失败婚姻，被判给丈夫的女儿，再加一次异域的有妇之夫.....
这个骷髅真是太硬了。够硬，所以够英雄。

所谓生命力，总是在自然法则中运行的。
自然界有着同化和异化作用，但是最终还是有无法同化的东西
可以同化的就被吸收，不能被同化的就被排泄到外界去更自由也更辗转的循环。而我们的社会也差不多。
所以顺便说一句，如果以后有人骂你是一坨屎，可以把它当做赞赏。

Talking With Kathryn Bolkovac About Her Experience as The Whistleblower

Posted: 08/16/11 07:48 PM ET

 

After seeing (and reviewing) The Whistleblower, I contacted Kathryn Bolkovac, whose story is the basis of the movie, and interviewed her. Her answers speak for themselves, but also give such a sense of her persona, grit and determination.

FOSTER: You were faced with a situation where the people you worked with were engaged in something very shocking. Do you have any insight as to how or why they got involved with trafficking?

I really do not think there is clear cut answer for this. Everyone is an individual and is accountable to their individual behavior and potential illegal actions they committed and continue to commit in current missions. I think most people are truly just plain complicit in their thinking and tend to not get involved or look the other way to avoid any form of accountability, especially if they think that something does not directly affect them for their position. Then there is the group of people who can easily be swayed to join in on a pack mentality, who are morally and mentally weak or ignorant. When conditions are right as they have been and still are in many overseas missions around the world, or if they think they will not be caught or judged then it is easy for them to engage in illegal and corrupt behavior. They try to justify and minimize their actions. Finally, there are individuals who are just plain evil and corrupt, they see the money making potential of preying on the helpless and needy, and exploit every opportunity they can to make a buck, especially in an industry that involves sex. They are very good at dehumanizing, denial, and lying about what is going on.

FOSTER: What do you think needs to be done to address the trafficking issue? What can government do?

The trafficking issue at large is too complex to tackle with sweeping reform. There are so many different types of human trafficking each with different dynamics of funding the corruption. Obviously, many adults choose to be trafficked... or illegally transported across many borders to escape horrendous conditions in their own countries. These issues cannot be convoluted with organized criminal syndicates who are providing services to internationals all over the world, in the form of trafficking for forced prostitution. They are involved in the recruitment, abuse, desensitization, and sale of human flesh, into international missions as sex workers. This is what I want to discuss and what I think we can make a huge impact on based on my experiences as a former law enforcement officer, former UN employee, former representative of our U.S. government overseas, and as a former employee of one of the largest private government contractors in the world DynCorp.

FOSTER: What can our government do?

First, in the short term, the United States needs to take a serious look at why we are willing to allow private companies to engage in the profession of law enforcement. Government contractors are a needed and viable means to get many logistical and re-construction efforts accomplished. They are not a viable means for a protection force or as a mechanism for the use in training law enforcement officers in emerging democracies. Law enforcement is not a business. Policing is a calling. Does anyone really believe that private corporations are in this policing and operational mission business for anything but the money? We need to set an example with our own federal police selection units, perhaps via the Department of Justice as an example, why can we not recruit and most importantly train our own community police officers before we send them into these missions? My book accurately describes the pathetic training offered by the private company who sent me overseas, which I am sure was heavily subsidized with my tax dollars. It was a disgrace; none of us had even the minimum knowledge or idea of what we were supposed to be doing once we got into Bosnia.

If we are to continue to send "rent a cops " overseas with inadequate knowledge and inadequate protections from corrupt private companies, some of whom had serious questionable policing backgrounds we might want to stop and think about how this damages our reputation and our goals. The private company who fired me had free reign to treat me however they saw fit, no one was in authority to stop them. They were exempt from all U.S. government accountability and have never been held accountable for what they did to me to this day. How has this changed? It has not.

Second, get the Civilian Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (CEJA) out of committee and get it passed. It has been more than 12 years overdue. [NOTE: CEJA would allow the U.S. Justice Department to prosecute government contractors and employees for certain crimes committed overseas. It would complement the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (MEJA), which provides similar criminal jurisdiction over Department of Defense employees and contractors but does not clearly apply to U.S. contractors working overseas for other federal agencies.]

Third, make government contractors accountable for their employee actions, by putting a clause in their contracts that require them to facilitate and allow oversight of both external and internal investigations by outside government agencies, when probable cause exists that employees are suspected, or implicated in criminal offenses. They must cooperate in the facilitation of prosecutions. They can no longer just fire people, and hope the problem goes away, which automatically curtails any further investigation.

Fourth, set examples by having the means available to prosecute and convict with meaningful sentences.

FOSTER: What can individuals do?

Learn, read, report, and stop burying your heads in the sand. Many of the people involved in these crimes could be your next door neighbor.

Get local law enforcement initiatives started, and ask your police chiefs this question. What kind of training is being offered to your new recruits and officers on the streets to recognize and investigate all forms of human trafficking?

Do you think a local police chief in the hills of Northern New Mexico, or in the farming community of southern Illinois, is even going to know what we are talking about? Does the local hotel have young female Hispanics working in the housekeeping department? They do not speak English, they have no documents, does he know what wage they are being paid and in what form? Think about it. I have been in these places have you?

 FOSTER: Many of the women and girls who are trafficked are promised jobs that don't materialize. What do you think would be effective to get the word out to them so that fewer of them fall prey to these types of promises?

The only effect we can have on this is to stop the demand.

FOSTER: How did you sustain yourself?

Continued faith in our justice system, lots of hard workouts and sweat, many tears and my husband would make me a strong gin tonic with lots of lemon and ice once in a while.
 



 

 Follow Stephenie Foster on Twitter: www.twitter.com/StephenieFoster

      刚刚看完告密者，是由木乃伊女主演的，看完很郁闷。真的有点像口语老师Paul说的，人长大了，就喜欢看深刻的电影了 。

       故事的主题是以波黑内战，联合国维和部队人员参与贩卖人口，最后英雄女主角拯救局面的故事情节演的。刚开始的女主，就是一心为着钱去的。当上级军官宣扬着正义和平的时候，女主没有多少投入，反而是周围的男队友们很亢奋。

        但是随着剥茧抽丝的叙事过程，事实浮出了水面，之所以在这样一个战争国度，能有这样多的酒吧生存下来，服务的不是本国的男士，而是维和部队的军官。 收容所的老奶奶说:"战争让我们国家的男人都死了一半，你说这些女孩是为谁服务的！“说的是那么的平静，但是我的内心却很波澜。

     女主在剧中说了这样的话，她说，

-- 以前在家里，我们分局有25个人，我了解他们每一个人，知道他们的一切，他们的家人。

--原本我以为是和一群精英来到这里工作，现在我甚至都不知道他们到底是谁？！

       西方社会一直认为，人之初，性本恶，原来我不这么认为，近些年我接触的事情使我慢慢深刻地理解了这句话的内涵。在西方这样一个发达，法律体制健全的社会里，每个人在这样的体系中生活，没有机会，也没有理由让你做出出乎意料的行为，至少对大部分人是这样的。加之开明的价值观和先进的的城市化进程使得很多东西不会引起恐慌和围观。但是即使这样绅士和文明的人类被放逐到萨拉热窝这样的动荡地带，没有法治，种族间斗殴，社会信仰的不健全。人性中那种龌龊，极端，邪恶的念头就会被只能各种松弛的约束带释放出来，原来我们不敢说的敢说了，原来我们不敢做的敢做了。甚至变本加厉，异常极端，电影中出现的很多情节让你感觉仿佛不是去酒吧找乐子，更像是对很多之前禁忌的猎奇，而无辜的女孩就成为其中的玩偶，他们的痛苦就像是反应的结果，出现才是正常的，才够满足他们的好奇。

       经历了千辛万苦，想救出的女孩终究还是死了，当做了杀鸡儆猴中的鸡，看着挺心酸，但是我觉得确实最好的结局。她所遭受的痛苦，是那种死亡可以替代的，死亡还是平静的，折磨却没有止境。可能，我是说可能，拯救出的她们没有技能，没有能力，或许还有很多又会做回老本行，但是，那种存在的尊严俨然可以被称之为人！！！这很重要~~~

   对于一个纪录电影来说，挖掘的深度已经到达了对人性拷问的程度。印象最深的是女主问女孩子你到底和不和我走的时候。剧情在两个女人的对峙下达到情绪的高潮。用女性主义的角度去剖析它是很简单的。无论是开头女主因为热爱工作，而没能得到女儿的监护权；还是故事发生地点是一个男性占大多数的公司；被虐待女孩的照片成为缺失女性权利最有力的佐证。对，我说这是很简单的观点因为我觉得女性主义已经被用烂了。研究生什么都可以套上一套理论。即使有理有据，但只是乘前人之荫。所以对于女主和女二的对峙上升到对人性懦弱的展现，作为观众表示十分惊喜。
  要说主旨精神，这部片子和真探的基调十分相似。都是质疑人类在罪恶面前是否会屈服于权利和诱惑。描绘的人性阴暗面又和处女之死挺像的。处女们和妓女们在影片的最后都没有得到拯救。所以这就是为什么我看完这片子心情非常低落。
  最让我惊讶的是看完这个发生在完全不一样世界里的故事居然让我想到了发生在我身边的事。这种屈服于权利，为了暂时的安全而放弃自己的自尊的情节屡屡皆是。最明显的例子就是装逼了。最近又和朋友们讨论起了优越感的来源与生成。来到这辈子读过的第三个大学，我越来越发现人性的弱点都是相似的。好像贬低别人变成了一种天经地义的事情。做什么说什么都可以成为划分自己与他人界限的理由。而因为害怕被孤立和不认可，更是可以牺牲自己的灵魂和自尊与现实世界的既定价值做交换。在电影是用灵魂交换命，那还可以理解。至少女孩子还曾经有勇气站出来指认凶手。我是不懂身边的男男女女。电影里女孩子的代价是生命啊。在极度的恐惧之下做出不明智的决定会让人觉得是一种悲剧的美。换作是我，自问也不一定能把握住自己最后仅存的理智。但身边衣食无忧的年轻人的心理状态我就不甚了解了。牺牲自己牺牲得毫无价值和美感。
   是不是我挖掘出他们的美感我就能写出剧本了。想到这个就心好累。不想再写影评了。不知道还要读多少书才能理解他们。还要担着有生之年都可能理解不了的准备。不多说了。我看书去了。